Mintzberg theories On Leadership-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Critically Analysis Of Mintzberg and his theories On Leadership. Answer: Introduction The first step in developing ones own ability to lead people in any business organization is to understand own self to a complete extent. In order to take the initial step, it is important to have an enhanced comprehension of ones leadership style, type of personality and related skills of leadership. Every individual has his or her own set of the qualities of a leader which vary from person to person (Bolman Deal, 2014). Leadership is determined by the experience, philosophies, and styles. It is very important to take sufficient time in evaluating ones own strengths and weaknesses in leadership. The fact also needs to be considered that leadership cannot be taught to anyone. It can only be inculcated by oneself. Through an assessment of the leadership skills, I got to understand and reflect on my strengths and weakness as a leader. The evaluations are as follows: My strengths and weaknesses in leadership I noticed that I have authenticity in every walk of life which also gets reflected in my leadership style. As a leader, I need to be fair and morally right in leadership. I happen to have a transparent approach and command over the confidence and esteem which has been also reviewed by the team members with whom I have worked. One of my strengths regarding leadership skills is being able to coach effectively. The skills of being an efficient coach help in the growth of the employees or the team members. The team members and the employees are nurtured in the orientation of achieving the highest level of their performance. I am able to have a clear insight regarding any purpose and able to create hopeful visions for the entire team of any work. My team members have always felt inspired and compelled to achieve their individual as well as team goals (Bliss, Pecukonis Snyder-Voge, 2014). Another individual strength that I have is the ability to make an effective communication to my team members or any other individual or groups in that respect. This is a very important skill which is very necessary for achieving and managing the team or groups and making things done according to the planned way. When the matter comes to the weaknesses that I have in aspects of leadership, the lack of innovation is very much highlighted (Day et al., 2014). Having innovative thought process regarding taking risks, autonomous and ingenuity through the process is what I lack to a significant extent. Regarding the aspect of emotional expression which is also required to be a good and effective leader is lacking in me. In spite of having good communication skills, I am not very good at expressing my emotions along with leading the team in an authentic way. Having free expression of emotions within a team prevents me from building an association with work mates (Gurdjian, Halbeisen Lane, 2014). Building interpersonal relationships are also one of the aspects in which I find to be weak. Building strong interpersonal relationships within the group would help me in bringing the best out of my team as team members respond and work in a better way in an environment where they feel home (Komives Wagner, 2016) Critical analysis of Mintzberg and his theories on leadership In order to meet several demands of performing their functions, the organizational managers take up multiple roles. Henry Mintzberg has recognized ten roles that are common to the business operations of all the managers. These roles are categorized into 3 groups such as Interpersonal, informational and decisional groups. It is also observed that Henry Mintzberg recommends that business organizations can be categorized along three fundamental dimensions such as 1) The main part of the business organization, that is, the portion of the business organization which has a key role in the determination of its failure or success,2) the key mechanism that assists in coordination denotes to the major method of business organizations use for coordination of the activities and 3) the kind of decentralization used, which is, the extent to which the business organizations involves the subordinates in the process of decision making. By using these basic dimensions, Mintzberg recommends that the st rategy that is adopted by any business organization and the extent to which the organization implements those particular strategy leads in five configurations of the structures, machinery bureaucracy, simple structure, divisionalize form, adhocracy, and professional bureaucracy (Lopez, 2014). It was observed that the most special feature in of theories of Mintzberg is that these theories have stressed deliver the significance of the emergent strategy, that develops informally at any levels of the business organization. This happens in a form of compliment or alternative to deliberate the strategy that is determined at a conscious level either with the acquiescence of the high management or by the top management. His theories are strongly critical in nature regarding the strategy literature stream that concentrates on the deliberate strategy. His theories on leadership critically analyze the effectiveness of the theories itself. Mintzberg also regards as the folklore the common conce pt regarding the lateral relationships and maintaining a comparatively strict control of the units, activities and time in a business organization. He also refers manager to be a leader and neither a puppet or a conductor (Ladegard Gjerde, 2014). The theories of leadership by Mintzberg further provide analysis of the managerial roles which are performed by the manager. He has also attempted to have an assessment of the 5 structural configurations. It also assesses the adoption of a strategy of a business organization and the extent to which the outcomes are configured in the same organization. It was also observed that Mintzberg criticizes the separation between the leadership and management and states both of them to be complementing to each other. He has clear statements regarding the fact that leadership is the successful practice of management. Through his theories of leadership, he reflects that all organizations should be structured and configured to specific fields through the association of leadership (Madsen, 2001). Conclusion The reflection on the personal strengths and weakness regarding the skills of leadership is conducted in the assignment. An in-depth analysis of the theories of Mintzberg on leadership is being illustrated in brief in the paper. References Bolman, L. and Deal, T., 2014. Leadership and management. Christian Youth Work in Theory and Practice: A Handbook, p.245. Bliss, D.L., Pecukonis, E. and Snyder-Vogel, M., 2014. Principled leadership development model for aspiring social work managers and administrators: Development and application. Human Services Organizations Management, Leadership Governance, 38(1), pp.5-15. Day, D.V., Fleenor, J.W., Atwater, L.E., Sturm, R.E. and McKee, R.A., 2014. Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), pp.63-82. Gurdjian, P., Halbeisen, T. and Lane, K., 2014. Why leadership-development programs fail. McKinsey Quarterly, 1(1), pp.121-126. Komives, S.R. and Wagner, W.E., 2016. Leadership for a better world: Understanding the social change model of leadership development. John Wiley Sons. Lopez, R., 2014. The relationship between leadership and management: Instructional approaches and its connections to organizational growth. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 6(1), p.98. Ladegard, G. and Gjerde, S., 2014. Leadership coaching, leader role-efficacy, and trust in subordinates. A mixed methods study assessing leadership coaching as a leadership development tool. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), pp.631-646. Madsen, M.T., 2001. Leadership and management theories revisited. Handelshjskolen.